YOUR HATE CAN'T STOP FATE
I am well aware that some supporters of the Prosecution and even some members of Travis Alexander's support group have joined this page to sabotage and run off members with harassment. You guys should know the we have grown to over 300 members in two days, and in two weeks I expect to have 3000!
You cannot stop FATE with your HATE. Jodi will see freedom again. Amen be blessed.
Thank You "ADVOCATERS", please help us by joining, signing and spreading the word. ♥ ♥ ♥
OUR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE BLOG - PLEASE JOIN
OUR BLOG
SIGN THE PETITION FOR APPEAL
THE PETITION
FOLLOW US ON TWITTER - We will take JODI'S messages via phone and repost:
OUR TWITTER
No one is sabotaging anything and no one has harassed anyone. Why do you think that speaking the truth is doing either of those. See, that's what's wrong with your thinking. Because people see and know the truth you think that they are harassing or sabotaging something? How old are you anyway? 15? You're thinking is very immature. Members? Where do you join to be a member? How do you get "help" on here, you're advertising help, information and knowledge but I don't see any. You're asking for money is all.
ReplyDeleteOh and may I suggest you look at the family of the horrible man in Ohio who kidnapped those three girls. They are TRUE grace - they aren't standing behind someone they know committed a crime, they are standing up for what they know is RIGHT. You can act as crazy as you want, but the minute you take someone's life, sorry, it's over. No ONE has that right. NO ONE. So why you think JA doesn't have to pay for her crime is beyond the rest of the world. I'm very proud of you for your overwhelming amount of members, my gosh out of the 300 million that live in the US, 300 is quite a lot! That's pretty much your Arias family isn't it?
ReplyDeleteSmile - and say cheese! Actually if you do a recount of your signatures of the REAL ones, and the ones that are actually of SUPPORT, you're probably under a hundred, but that's okay.
ReplyDeleteI'm figuring that if they watched any media at all (assuming they had to in order to know if the media could 'taint' a jury) and they still think she is not guilty, then why couldn't a jury be able to use their own mind and find her not guilty if they believed that as well? I mean your 'supporters' weren't tainted, why do you think the jury was? Yes, see you have to use your brain a bit in order to have an argument or try to prove a valid point. You can't keep having do-overs until you get the result you want. It doesn't work that way.
Here's a little humor for ya.....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3bqNkA4jsE